Siaffing for a telecommunting job Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Siaffing for a telecommunting job - Essay Example The main reason for recommending this method is that conducting interviews with the former incumbent, and their immediate supervisor, will help capture the important details related to the job descriptions and specifications. In addition, interviews with specialists in the public relations sector will be crucial to help capture any details that the outgoing office holder and the supervisors might fail to indicate. Furthermore, interviews with specialists in telecommuting will also be crucial to help provide information that the company will use to realign this new role. It is important to note that, this method would still be applicable in analyzing a job in the traditional office environment since the same details are crucial apart from those related to telecommuting. In effect, the same analysis method will be applicable apart from conducting interviews with a telecommuting specialist. The best procedure to use in recruiting and hiring a telecommuter for the company will be through hiring of a telecommuter from within the company. In this regard, this method is the most appropriate since the company will avoid the problems related to insufficient socialization. In addition, it is important to ensure that the telecommuter hired is trustworthy, of which it will be a challenge to prove trustworthy once hiring was from outside the company. Beyond the value congruence and appropriate skills for the job, and trustworthiness, it is important to investigate other important characteristics important for telecommuting. In this regard, these characteristics incorporate the capability to work independent of express supervision, self-motivation, confidence, and an individual with crucial managerial skills (Schilling, 1999). In is only through hiring within the company that this is achievable. On the other hand, if the job was not of a telecommuting nature, this procedure of hi ring and recruitment could be applicable since the same features are required in a

The Impact of the Dred Scott Decision on Slavery in U.S. Territories Research Paper

The Impact of the Dred Scott Decision on Slavery in U.S. Territories - Research Paper Example The North and the South had an opposing opinion of slavery. Hostilities and violence were the only way to resolve the problem.i Dred Scott was not able to witness the abolition of slavery. Even so, his determined and fearless struggle for freedom greatly contributed to the ultimate end of slavery. The consequences of the Dred Scott case were experienced by all U.S. territories. For northern territories the decision was very much troubling because it suggested that a legal mechanism by which a territory could put a stop to the establishment of a system of slavery was absent. For southern territories the decision was a stroke of luck that established the legality of slavery and apparently resolved all issues about the legitimacy of the expansion of slavery.ii Only a small number of trials had ever stimulated such a scale of public interest. Due to the Dred Scott decision, the principles of Popular Sovereignty—a doctrine which stipulated that a territory could make a vote whether or not slavery would be lawful-- and Missouri Compromise—an Act that limited slavery to territories located south of the 39th parallel-- became hence null and void.iii Slavery was given the right to expand to all U.S. territories. ... ssible followers to reconstruct society according to its will, and neither the Congress nor the President was primed to provide a strong support for the Court’s decision. However, many thought that legislative branch possessed the authority to restrict the establishment of the system of slavery into other U.S. territories, but the resolution of the Court had definitely blurred the political system. The nation was yet to understand the consequences of the Dred Scott resolution when the elections and campaigns carried out all over the nation in 1858 created a setting for political dialogue on the issue of slavery. This dialogue was most remarkable in the sequence of debates performed in Illinois where contender Abraham Lincoln and Senator Stephen Douglas talked about the major concerns at the time. Douglas, as one of the key supporters of the principle of popular sovereignty, had to take advantage of the debates to justify how this principle could remain existent as regards to t he Dred Scott decision. On the other hand, for Lincoln, who was a somewhat obscure political personality, the media exposure of these debates raised him as a talented orator on behalf of those who aspired to prevent the expansion of slavery into other U.S. territories.iv Although Douglas would in the end achieve another term as senator, it was Lincoln who gained the highest achievement from the debates, for his arguments became very popular and his reputation more well-known. Lincoln, two years later, would run as a presidential candidate. As Douglas and Lincoln discussed the issues of the time, their struggles echoed the nation’s disposition—a society that remained enthusiastic to talk about diplomatically the political issues the influenced national affairs.v Northern and Southern